Publications

Smith and Ingram (2010) - Clinical and cost effectiveness evaluation of low friction and shear garments; Journal of Wound Care Vol. 19, no 12, December 2010, pp.535-42.    https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/jowc.2010.19.12.535

Data, including pressure ulcer incidence, location, grading  and final outcome upon discharge was collected from 369 patients alongside locally derived expenditures to assess the role of low friction garments in hospital setting. They found that Parafricta low friction garments have a role to play in the prevention of skin breakdown and appear to be both clinically and cost effective. 

Stephen-Haynes et al (2011) -  Clinical outcomes using a low friction and shear garment in the care home setting;  Wounds UK, Vol. 7, No 4, pp. 76-84. https://www.wounds-uk.com/journals/issue/28/article-details/clinical-outcomes-using-a-low-friction-and-shear-garment-in-the-care-home-setting

This study evaluated 25 patients in a care home setting with grade 2 pressure ulcers to determine whether Parafricta products were effective in conjunction with current treatment. They found improvement in the skin with less redness, oedema and a reduction in friction and shear. Parafricta is an additional resource that can aid the management of patients at risk of pressure damage.

Gleeson, D (2015) “Pressure ulcer reduction using low-friction fabric bootees” British Journal of Nursing (Tissue Viability Supplement) 24 (6) https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup6.S26

In reaction to high instances of grade 2 heel pressure ulcers St Helens and Knowsley Trust began using Parafricta bootees. This study found that implementing the use of the Parafricta low-friction fabric bootees has proved a good strategy for the Trust, ensuring a reduction not only in heel pressure ulcer incidence but also in achieving zero harm targets and providing substantial cost benefits

Gleeson, D (2016) “Heel Pressure Ulcer prevention: a 5-year initiative using low-friction bootees in a hospital setting”” Wounds UK Vol12 No4 https://www.wounds-uk.com/journals/issue/50/article-details/heel-pressure-ulcer-prevention-a-5-year-initiative-using-low-friction-bootees-in-a-hospital-setting

This study, evaluates the implementation of Parafricta bootees in a hospital setting 5 years after they were introduced. Parafricta low-friction bootees when used in routine practise are shown to have played a part in reduction of heel pressure ulcers and in particular the decline in the proportion of heel pressure ulcers to pressure ulcers on other sites. The pressure ulcer instance in the Trust was found to be below the national average. The reduction in heel pressure ulcers led to significant savings for the Trust.

Gefen, A (2017) “Why is the heel particularly vulnerable to pressure ulcers” British Journal of Nursing Vol 26 No20 Tissue Viability Supplement  https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.Sup20.S62

This article explains the vulnerability of heels to pressure ulcers from a biomechanical engineering perspective taking into account hospital settings. It discusses the growing and solid evidence that low friction fabric garments may provide added benefits in preventing heel ulcers. Managing friction through Parafricta low friction fabric garments is a promising way forward.

Schofield, A (2018) “Mitigating the damaging effects of tissue distortions by using a low-friction heel protector” British Journal of Nursing | Vol. 27 | No. Sup12 | pp S27–S34   https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.Sup12.S27

This article reports the findings of a small, non-controlled evaluation over a 2 week period in 3 different care settings. The results show Parafricta low friction bootees have a played a significant part in the reduction of heel pressure ulcers, reduced pain and increased comfort. In conclusion, should be regarded as a standard care tool in pressure ulcer care prevention in all care settings. 

This article evaluates the impact of low-friction bedding in an acute burn setting, the study was conducted in 3 burn services in 2 hospitals with a cohort of 131. The article concludes that low-friction bedding is safe for burns victims, with a significant reduction in graft loss. 

Sylvie Hampton et al.(2009) Parafricta Fabric: Can it reduce the potential for pressure ulcer damage; Journal of Community Nursing, April, Vol. 23, Issue 4, pp. 28-31 http://www.jcn.co.uk/journals/issue/3/04-2009

There is a relationship between reduction of oedema and inflammation under the epidermis and the wearing of Parafricta garments. This leads to the conclusion that Parafricta should be considered for any resident or patient that is at risk of pressure damage related to shear and friction.

Pressure sores are a preventable complication for immobile patients and are often caused by shearing and friction. Parafricta, a fabric with low friction properties, reduces the potential for pressure damage.

Kerr, A. (2008). 'Reducing shear and Friction: Parafricta undergarments'. Nursing and Residential Care. Vol. 10, No 01, pp 626-628 https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/nrec.2008.10.1.27956

Bree-Aslan, C. and Hampton, S. (2013) 'Parafricta and the prevention of shearing forces: heel ulcers'. Nursing and Residential Care, Vol. 10, No. 01, pp, 78-80   https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/pdf/10.12968/nrec.2008.10.2.28124

A case study that discusses the role that Parafricta fabric can play in reducing and preventing pressure, shear and heel damage.

https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/jowc.2010.19.12.535